<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TweetLater Follower Vetting Improved &#8211; See How Others Decided</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialoomphblog.com/follower-vetting-improved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialoomphblog.com/follower-vetting-improved/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:41:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.socialoomphblog.com/follower-vetting-improved/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialoomphblog.com/?p=257#comment-358</guid>
		<description>is there any way to customize the waiting period or is it fixed at 72 hours? At minimum, putting this information somewhere on the automated vetting settings would be helpful since the default actions were being applied to my list before I got a chance to manually review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is there any way to customize the waiting period or is it fixed at 72 hours? At minimum, putting this information somewhere on the automated vetting settings would be helpful since the default actions were being applied to my list before I got a chance to manually review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princetonwatch</title>
		<link>http://www.socialoomphblog.com/follower-vetting-improved/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>princetonwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialoomphblog.com/?p=257#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Cool, this will be a timesaver for me.  I would never use auto-follow before because of the spam issues</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, this will be a timesaver for me.  I would never use auto-follow before because of the spam issues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: datadirt</title>
		<link>http://www.socialoomphblog.com/follower-vetting-improved/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>datadirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 11:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialoomphblog.com/?p=257#comment-173</guid>
		<description>YES! The new vetting features are just brilliant. In the beginning I had vetting turned off, but as Twitter becomes more and more spammy, this is a perfect tool. Love the crowdsourcing-score idea, and one little detail you changes - the display of the overall number of users to vet - is also very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES! The new vetting features are just brilliant. In the beginning I had vetting turned off, but as Twitter becomes more and more spammy, this is a perfect tool. Love the crowdsourcing-score idea, and one little detail you changes &#8211; the display of the overall number of users to vet &#8211; is also very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alrady</title>
		<link>http://www.socialoomphblog.com/follower-vetting-improved/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Alrady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialoomphblog.com/?p=257#comment-172</guid>
		<description>This sounds really SWEET Until recently I didnt&#039; realise there was  a problem like you mentioned. This will be so helpful THANKS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds really SWEET Until recently I didnt&#39; realise there was  a problem like you mentioned. This will be so helpful THANKS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
